All articles

Vadadustat (Vafseo): Why a Pill for Kidney Anaemia Was Approved Only for Dialysis Patients

Vadadustat (Vafseo): Why a Pill for Kidney Anaemia Was Approved Only for Dialysis Patients

In Brief

Why Haemoglobin Falls in Kidney Disease

The kidneys are not only a filter. They produce erythropoietin, the hormone that tells the bone marrow to make red cells. As the kidneys fail the instruction stops arriving, and anaemia follows: fatigue, breathlessness, poor exercise tolerance.

For decades the answer was direct — inject the missing hormone. It works, but it requires injections, cold storage and careful dose titration.

How Vadadustat Works

The body has a built-in oxygen sensor: the HIF factor. When oxygen is plentiful a dedicated enzyme continuously degrades it. When oxygen is scarce — at altitude, for instance — the enzyme slows, HIF accumulates and switches on a programme: more erythropoietin, better iron handling, more active blood formation.

Vadadustat blocks that enzyme. The body behaves as if it had gone up a mountain, though the person has gone nowhere. From there it is the patient's own physiology doing the work, not an externally supplied hormone.

An important consequence: not only erythropoietin production switches on but the accompanying tuning of iron metabolism — the mechanism sits closer to the natural one than an injection of the finished hormone does.

The Core Story: Two Trials, Two Different Answers

The development programme was built honestly: the same molecule was tested in two large trials — dialysis patients separately, pre-dialysis patients separately. In both cases the comparator was darbepoetin alfa, the standard injection, not placebo.

INNO2VATE (NEJM, 2021) — 3,923 patients on dialysis. A major cardiovascular event occurred in 18.2% on vadadustat versus 19.3% on the injection; hazard ratio 0.96 (95% CI 0.83–1.11). Non-inferiority was met on both safety and haemoglobin [1]. ▸PRO2TECT (NEJM, 2021) — 3,476 patients not on dialysis. On haemoglobin the drug was again no worse than the injection. But the hazard ratio for cardiovascular events came out at 1.17 (95% CI 1.01–1.36) against a pre-specified margin of 1.25 — the margin was missed [2].

INNO2VATE (dialysis)PRO2TECT (non-dialysis)
Patients3,9233,476
ComparatorDarbepoetin alfaDarbepoetin alfa
Haemoglobin: non-inferiorYesYes
Cardiovascular safety: non-inferiorYes (HR 0.96)*No (HR 1.17, margin 1.25)*
Regulatory outcomeIndication grantedNo indication

What That Actually Means

The phrase missed the margin needs precision, because it is easy to misread.

It was agreed in advance that the drug would count as equivalent if the upper bound of the confidence interval stayed below 1.25. It came out at 1.36. This means a higher risk could not be ruled out — not that harm was proven. The distinction is fundamental, but in such a situation the regulator acts conservatively: it approves where the evidence held and declines where it did not.

Hence the unusually narrow wording of the indication: dialysis for at least three months. Not kidney disease, not anaemia in CKD — precisely the population in which the positive trial was run.

Where It Sits Among Its Relatives

DrugUnited StatesElsewhere
Vadadustat (Vafseo)Approved, *dialysis only*Approved in Japan, EU
Daprodustat (Jesduvroq)Approved, *dialysis only*Approved in Japan
Roxadustat (Evrenzo)*FDA refused*Approved in Japan, China, EU

The pattern is visible: the US regulator accepted the class, but admitted only those molecules and those populations where the cardiovascular safety data were convincing. The class mechanism and the roxadustat story are covered in a separate guide.

The Practical Side

ParameterDetail
FormulationTablets
WhoAdults on dialysis ≥ 3 months
StorageOrdinary; no cold chain
MonitoringHaemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin saturation
IronUsually required — stimulation without raw material is pointless

A separate word on the goal of treatment: haemoglobin in kidney disease is not pushed to the level of a healthy person. Attempts at full normalisation produced more cardiovascular events in earlier trials, and that is a property of the entire class of agents stimulating blood formation. The target range is deliberately modest, and the nephrologist sets it.

What Cannot Be Claimed Yet

That the drug is safer than injections — in the dialysis population it is equivalent, not better. ▸That it can be used before dialysis — that is precisely what the trial failed to support. ▸That the class members are interchangeable: roxadustat, daprodustat and vadadustat have different trial results and different regulatory fates; the mechanism is shared, but conclusions do not transfer. ▸Long-term data beyond the trial horizons are limited.

Who It Is Not For

▸Patients with kidney disease not yet on dialysis, under the current US indication. ▸Anyone whose iron stores are not replenished: iron first, stimulation second. ▸Anyone expecting a normal haemoglobin: the goal of therapy is different and deliberately more modest.

Bottom Line

Mechanism: mimicking oxygen shortage switches on the body's own erythropoietin production instead of injecting the hormone. ▸Dialysis patients: equivalent to the standard injection on both haemoglobin and cardiovascular events. ▸Non-dialysis patients: haemoglobin rises just as well, but safety could not be demonstrated — hence no indication. ▸The shape of the approval mirrors the shape of the evidence, a good example of honest regulatory logic. ▸Iron is mandatory — otherwise there is nothing to stimulate.

Treatment can be discussed at a consultation; the drug can be ordered here.

References

1. Eckardt KU, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Vadadustat for Anemia in Patients Undergoing Dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(17):1601–1612. PMID 33913638

2. Chertow GM, et al. Vadadustat in Patients with Anemia and Non-Dialysis-Dependent CKD. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(17):1589–1600. PMID 33913637

3. Sarnak MJ, et al. Vadadustat for treatment of anemia in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease receiving peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023;38(10):2358–2367. PMID 37096396

4. VAFSEO (vadadustat) — US Prescribing Information, Akebia Therapeutics.

Key facts
  • Vadadustat (brand name Vafseo, Akebia/Otsuka) is an oral treatment for anaemia of chronic kidney disease from the class of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors.
  • The FDA approved it in March 2024 with a narrow indication: adults on dialysis for at least three months.
  • Mechanism: the drug mimics oxygen shortage, so the HIF factor stops being degraded and the body produces its own erythropoietin instead of receiving it by injection.
  • INNO2VATE (NEJM, 2021): 3,923 dialysis patients; a major cardiovascular event occurred in 18.2% on vadadustat versus 19.3% on darbepoetin alfa (hazard ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.83–1.11) — the non-inferiority criterion was met.
  • PRO2TECT (NEJM, 2021): 3,476 patients not on dialysis; the hazard ratio for the same events was 1.17 (95% CI 1.01–1.36), outside the pre-specified margin of 1.25 — the safety criterion was not met.
  • On haemoglobin, vadadustat was no worse than the injection in both trials: the two programmes diverged only on the cardiovascular endpoint.
  • Hence the shape of the approval: the indication was narrowed to the population where the data held, rather than extended across kidney disease as a whole.
  • For a dialysis patient the practical gain is a tablet instead of injections, with no cold chain required for storage.
  • The class as a whole is treated cautiously: its close relative roxadustat was refused approval by the FDA over safety questions.
  • The drug is prescription-only, started by a nephrologist, and requires monitoring of haemoglobin and iron stores — stimulating red cell production without iron is pointless.

Frequently asked questions

An injection delivers the finished hormone from outside. Vadadustat delivers nothing — it makes the body produce its own erythropoietin by blocking the enzyme that normally degrades the HIF factor. The cell then behaves as though oxygen were short: the whole physiological programme of blood formation switches on, improved iron handling included. The practical difference for the patient is a tablet instead of injections, and no cold chain.

Because that is exactly where the evidence divided. In INNO2VATE, in dialysis patients, vadadustat proved no worse than the standard injection on both haemoglobin and cardiovascular events. In PRO2TECT, in patients not on dialysis, it raised haemoglobin just as well, but the hazard ratio for cardiovascular safety was 1.17 against a pre-specified margin of 1.25 — the margin was missed. The regulator approved precisely the part where the data held.

In trials of this design the acceptable degree of worsening is agreed in advance. Here the drug would be judged equivalent if the upper bound of the confidence interval stayed below 1.25. It came out at 1.36 — meaning the data could not rule out a higher risk than the comparator. That is not proof of harm; it is a failure to demonstrate safety in this group. The distinction matters, and it is in exactly that form that it entered the regulator's decision.

Both belong to the same class and work through the same mechanism, but their regulatory fates differ. Roxadustat is approved in Japan, China and the European Union, while the FDA refused approval over safety questions. Vadadustat is approved in the US, but with a narrow indication — dialysis only. The class mechanism and the roxadustat story are covered in a separate guide on [roxadustat](/en/blog/roxadustat-evrenzo-anemia-chronic-kidney-disease).

As a rule yes, and this is not a formality. The drug starts red cell production, but the body builds those cells out of iron. If stores are empty, the stimulus runs into a shortage of raw material: haemoglobin does not rise and laboratory tests show depleted reserves. Ferritin and transferrin saturation are therefore checked before and during treatment, and iron is given according to the results — sometimes intravenously.

That is a nephrologist's decision, not the patient's or a general physician's. It depends on current haemoglobin, the dose of the previous agent, iron stores, coexisting cardiovascular disease, and whether the drug is available in your country. Convenience alone is not sufficient grounds for switching if the current regimen is working well.

Not to the level of a healthy person. In nephrology the target range is deliberately modest: attempts to normalise haemoglobin fully in kidney disease produced more cardiovascular events in earlier trials, and that applies to the whole class of agents that stimulate blood formation, not to vadadustat alone. The specific target is set by the nephrologist, following the ranges in the guidelines they work to.

Share
Follow on TelegramGet new articles, research updates and practical health tips
Читать на русскомЧитати українською

This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult your physician before making health decisions. Full disclaimer

Ready to Take Action?

A consultation starts where the article ends: your history, your labs, a plan for your case.

Book consultationAsk a question