All articles

Sotatercept (Winrevair): The First Drug in Pulmonary Hypertension That Treats the Narrowing, Not the Spasm

Sotatercept (Winrevair): The First Drug in Pulmonary Hypertension That Treats the Narrowing, Not the Spasm

In Brief

What Happens in the Pulmonary Vessels

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is not high blood pressure in the familiar sense. It concerns the vessels carrying blood from the heart to the lungs.

Cells in the walls of those arteries begin to multiply excessively. The wall thickens, the lumen narrows, resistance to flow rises. The right ventricle must push blood through ever narrower vessels — and gradually wears out.

Clinically this is breathlessness on exertion, fatigue and fainting. The disease is rare, but untreated the outlook is poor.

Why the Earlier Drugs Did Not Solve the Problem

The three classes on which treatment rested for decades — prostacyclins, endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors — all essentially do one thing: widen the vessel by relieving spasm.

This works and prolongs life. But the wall keeps thickening regardless of whether the vessel is widened. Figuratively: the pipe furs up from inside while we adjust its bore from outside.

What Is Actually Broken

Two opposing signals meet in the cells of the vessel wall:

SignalWhat it doesWhat happens in the disease
Through the *BMPR2* receptorRestrains cell divisionWeakened
Through *activins* and related proteinsDrives divisionAmplified

The balance tips toward growth, and the wall thickens. This is precisely why mutations in the BMPR2 gene are found in a substantial share of patients with the hereditary form.

Sotatercept is built as a fragment of the receptor fused to part of an antibody. It works as a trap: it captures surplus activins from the blood before they reach the cells. The advantage returns to the restraining signal.

What the Trials Showed

STELLAR (NEJM, 2023) — 323 patients already on stable background therapy. Six-minute walk distance improved by 40.8 m more than on placebo (95% CI 27.5–54.1; p<0.001). Eight of nine secondary endpoints also favoured the drug [1].

ZENITH (NEJM, 2025) — 172 high-risk patients on the maximum tolerated background therapy. Here events were counted rather than metres [2]:

EventSotaterceptPlacebo
Composite (death, lung transplantation or hospitalisation)*17.4%**54.7%*
Death from any cause8.1%15.1%
Lung transplantation1.2%7.0%
Hospitalisation for worsening*9.3%**50.0%*

The hazard ratio for the composite was 0.24 (95% CI 0.13–0.43; p<0.001).

How It Is Used

ParameterDetail
RouteSubcutaneous injection
FrequencyOnce every three weeks
Role in the regimenAdded to background therapy
MonitoringHaemoglobin and platelets before every dose during titration
Discuss in advanceFertility

The Cost of the Effect

Nosebleeds and telangiectasia — dilated small vessels on the skin and mucous membranes; the most characteristic events. ▸Rising haemoglobin: the blood thickens more than it should, so levels are monitored regularly. ▸Falling platelets — the same blood counts cover this. ▸Effects on fertility: drugs of this class may affect reproductive function, and that conversation belongs before treatment rather than after.

What Cannot Be Claimed Yet

That it replaces background therapy — in every trial it was added to it. ▸That the effect holds for years: ZENITH was stopped early, and long-term observation is still accumulating. ▸That it suits other forms of pulmonary hypertension — the indication covers the arterial form, not hypertension secondary to lung disease or thromboembolism. ▸How it ranks against other drugs in strength — no head-to-head trials have been run.

Who It Is Not For

▸Patients with pulmonary hypertension of another origin — the mechanism does not address them. ▸Anyone with an already high haemoglobin or low platelets — decided case by case and requiring monitoring. ▸Anyone planning pregnancy without discussing the fertility question with their doctor. ▸As a reason to stop background therapy that is working.

Bottom Line

The first mechanism aimed at growth of the vessel wall rather than its spasm. ▸An activin trap returns the advantage to the restraining BMPR2 signal. ▸STELLAR: 40.8 m further on the walk test than placebo in patients on stable therapy. ▸ZENITH: events in 17.4% versus 54.7%, hospitalisations 9.3% versus 50.0%; the trial was stopped early for efficacy. ▸The cost — nosebleeds, telangiectasia, rising haemoglobin and falling platelets, all under regular monitoring.

Treatment can be discussed at a consultation; the drug can be ordered here.

References

1. Hoeper MM, et al. Phase 3 Trial of Sotatercept for Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(16):1478–1490. PMID 36877098

2. Humbert M, et al. Sotatercept in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension at High Risk for Death. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(20):1987–2000. PMID 40167274

3. WINREVAIR (sotatercept-csrk) — US Prescribing Information, Merck.

Key facts
  • Sotatercept (brand name Winrevair, Merck) is a trap molecule that intercepts excess signalling proteins of the activin family; it was approved by the FDA in March 2024.
  • It is the first drug in pulmonary arterial hypertension aimed not at widening the vessel but at the growth of its wall — that is, at the disease mechanism itself.
  • In this disease the balance is disturbed: signalling through the BMPR2 receptor, which restrains growth of vascular cells, is weakened, while the opposing activin signal is amplified, so the wall thickens and the lumen narrows.
  • Sotatercept binds the surplus activins and related proteins, returning the advantage to the restraining signal.
  • STELLAR (NEJM, 2023): 323 patients on stable background therapy; six-minute walk distance improved by 40.8 m more than on placebo (95% CI 27.5–54.1; p<0.001).
  • ZENITH (NEJM, 2025): 172 high-risk patients; a composite event — death, lung transplantation or hospitalisation — occurred in 17.4% versus 54.7% on placebo (hazard ratio 0.24; p<0.001).
  • ZENITH was stopped early: the interim analysis showed an advantage too clear to keep giving placebo.
  • Hospitalisation for worsening disease: 9.3% versus 50.0% — the largest single difference in that trial.
  • The drug is injected subcutaneously once every three weeks and is added to background therapy rather than replacing it.
  • The price of the effect: nosebleeds, telangiectasia, rising haemoglobin and falling platelets; blood counts are checked before every dose during titration.

Frequently asked questions

It is raised pressure in the vessels carrying blood from the heart to the lungs. The cause lies neither in the heart nor in systemic blood pressure: the pulmonary arteries themselves gradually narrow from within as the cells of their walls multiply, thickening the wall and shrinking the lumen. The right ventricle has to work against rising resistance and eventually fails. It presents as breathlessness on exertion, fatigue and fainting; the disease is rare but severe.

In where it acts. Prostacyclins, endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors all essentially widen the vessel by relieving spasm. That helps, but it does nothing to stop the wall thickening further. Sotatercept intervenes in the thickening itself. Put figuratively: the earlier drugs widen the bore of a pipe that keeps furring up from inside, while this one works on the furring.

Two opposing signals meet in the cells of the vessel wall. One runs through the BMPR2 receptor and restrains cell division. The other — through activins and related proteins — drives division. In this disease the first is weakened and the second amplified, so the wall grows. Sotatercept is built as a fragment of the receptor fused to part of an antibody: it captures surplus activins from the blood before they reach the cell. The advantage returns to the restraining signal.

In STELLAR, in patients on stable therapy, six-minute walk distance improved by 40.8 m more than on placebo. But the ZENITH data are more compelling — it enrolled high-risk patients and counted events rather than metres: death, lung transplantation or hospitalisation for worsening. Such an event occurred in 17.4% on the drug versus 54.7% on placebo. Hospitalisations: 9.3% versus 50.0%.

Because the difference was too large. Trials of this kind schedule an interim analysis in advance, and when the advantage is obvious, continuing to give placebo becomes unethical: patients in the comparison group are denied treatment already known to work. Stopping early for efficacy is a strong signal — and at the same time the reason less long-term data has been collected.

No. In both trials sotatercept was added to the background therapy patients were already receiving, and in ZENITH to the maximum tolerated dose of it. What is proven is therefore the addition, not a substitution. Existing therapy should not be stopped when sotatercept is started.

Nosebleeds and telangiectasia — dilated small vessels on the skin and mucous membranes — are characteristic. The drug also raises haemoglobin, sometimes excessively, and can lower platelet counts. A full blood count is therefore checked before every dose during titration and regularly thereafter. Fertility is discussed separately: drugs of this class may affect reproductive function, and that conversation belongs before treatment starts.

Share
Follow on TelegramGet new articles, research updates and practical health tips
Читать на русскомЧитати українською

This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult your physician before making health decisions. Full disclaimer

Ready to Take Action?

A consultation starts where the article ends: your history, your labs, a plan for your case.

Book consultationAsk a question